Showing posts with label math. Show all posts
Showing posts with label math. Show all posts

Monday, August 20, 2012

"Girls Get Curves" - combining math and body positivism


Danica McKellar  charmed teenage boys in the '80s as Winnie Cooper on The Wonder Years has grown up to be something of a nerd heartthrob.

Having attained her math degree from UCLA, and coauthoring the paper Percolation and Gibbs State Multiplicity for Ferromagnetic Ashkin-Teller Models in Two Dimensions, she went on to author a series of books encouraging young girls to be confident and pursue mathematics: Math Doesn't Suck, Kiss My Math, and Hot X: Algebra Exposed.

Recently, Ms. McKellar published her fourth, Girls Get Curves. This one appears to take on body image issues with her play on words.

It's a weird combination on the cover, though, flaunting her now-mature sexuality and offering advice on attracting "guys" more prominently than she actually pushes math.

Meanwhile, she told BuzzFeed:

People tell us our value lies in our appearance, and that's what we need to focus on instead of realizing hair and makeup and fashion — that's all fun but it's really decoration. It's not where our value lies, and it's not where our self-esteem should come from, because that's extremely damaging. Girls forget that the things that are going to make them feel happy and fulfilled are the things you do from the inside — like succeeding in math. If you look at a really hard math problem, and you persevere and you do solve it, then you build internal fortitude, and you see that you're stronger and smarter.

Ms. McKellar also comments on media and advertising:


In the book I talk about how we can’t compare ourselves to the images in magazines — they’re not real. If you want to aspire to look like somebody, aspire to look like somebody you have in your real life. 
I also have a section about how advertisements are designed to make us feel bad about ourselves, because if we’re not happy about how we look we don’t need their products. So it’s in the advertisers’ best interest to make us look less than. It’s really damaging — it’s damaging to girls and it’s not going to stop. So I’m hoping to give them a different perspective.

I agree. But I would have asked her about how this applies to the spread she did in Maxim.

Might these two sides of the actress/mathematician give girls a mixed message about where their real value lies? I'd love to hear your opinion.

Read the whole interview here.

Friday, March 23, 2012

"Geometric Porn" is not coming on your iPhone #FdAdFriday

"Something abstract existing in thought or as an idea but not having a physical or concrete existence. Visual geometry containing the non-explicit description of sexual organs or activity. Arising in the mind it intends to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings."

I never thought math could be so dirty. Watch the demo videos, by Luciano Foglia, if you dare to enter the abstractly sexual world of Geometric Porn.

The designer himself says:

"Suitable for children. While there are innumerable ways that pornography harms children, Geometric Porn will not traumatise them in any way. The content of this website is suitable for children aged 4 or over 4+."

Nonetheless, Apple rejected the app, stating:
"Apps that present excessively objectionable or crude content will be rejected. We found that many audiences would find your app concept objectionable, which is not in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines."
 Judge for yourself...


Geometric Porn App Preview from Luciano Foglia on Vimeo.



   

He also sells t-shirts:

Tip via kottke